Legal Opinion

Matyas v. Feddish

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 12, 1945No. 1364PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATSON, District Judge.

On April 17, 1945, this Court filed an opinion and entered final judgment after trial without a jury, dismissing the above captioned suit against the defendant, P. B. Feddish.1 On April 27,. 1945, the plaintiff filed a paper entitled “Exceptions”. It was suggested therein that, in accordance with Rule 52(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, the Court amend its opinion and its findings of fact and conclusions of law, a compliance with which would amount to a reversal of the judgment.

Rule 52(b), so far as pertihent, reads as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tulsa City Lines, Inc. v. MainsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bertrand W. Cohn v. United States of America, William R. Kent v. United States of America, Louise C. Kent v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
  2. Heikkila v. BarberDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1958
  3. Evangelical Lutheran Good Samaritan Society v. KolesarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  4. Rice v. SimmonsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. Flangas v. HerrmannNevada Supreme Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API