Legal Opinion

Entertainment Network, Inc. v. Lappin

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided April 18, 2001No. TH01-0076-C-T/HPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY FOLLOWING TRIAL

TINDER, District Judge.

I. Introduction

A. Summary

The relief sought in this case is the logical extension of Marshall McLuhan’s prophetic proposal from the 1960s that the “medium is the message.” Federal regulations guarantee that representatives of the media are entitled to observe a federal execution in the same manner as other citizen witnesses. No restrictions whatsoever are placed on how the media representatives report on what they observe. But that is not enough for the Plaintiff and the Intervening Plaintiff-they seek not just to view the execution — they seek to…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reverend Larry Rice Reverend Raymond Redlich New Life Evangelistic Center, Inc. v. Gary Kempker State of Missouri George Lombardi Don RoperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. SampsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  3. Rev. Larry Rice v. Gary KempkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API