Legal Opinion
WALTERS, ADMINISTRATOR OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Et Al. v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RADIATION SURVIVORS Et Al.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided October 9, 1984No. A-214PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Justice Rehnquist, Circuit Justice.
Applicants request that I stay an injunction issued by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California prohibiting on constitutional grounds the enforcement of 38 U. S. C. §§3404 and 3405. These sections prohibit the payment of a fee of more than $10 by a veteran to an agent or attorney in connection with a claim for monetary benefits under laws administered by the Veterans Administration.
The statute which the single District Judge found unconstitutional has been on the books in some form for 122 years. Within the past decade, this…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stephen H. Demarest v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Gendron v. SaxbeDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1975
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
3Cited by31 opinions
- Heideman v. South Salt Lake CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Murphy v. Zoning Com'n of Town of New MilfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- Marc Veasey v. Greg AbbottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Dutmer v. City of San Antonio, Tex.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1996
- United States v. MussariDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.