Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 3, 1977No. A-600PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Me. Justice Rehnquist, Circuit Justice.
The Solicitor General, on behalf of the Secretary of Labor, applies for a partial stay of an injunction issued by a three-judge District Court for the District of Idaho. That court held that § 8 (a) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 84 Stat. 1598, 29 U. S. C. § 657 (a), allowing warrantless entry and inspection of work places for OSHA violations, is in conflict with the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution, and enjoined further searches by the Secretary’s representative pursuant to that section. The applicant does not seek…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Colonnade Catering Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
3Cited by16 opinions
- NEW MOTOR VEHICLE BOARD OF CALIFORNIA v. ORRIN W. FOX CO. Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. George Anthony PappasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
- WALTERS, ADMINISTRATOR OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Et Al. v. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RADIATION SURVIVORS Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Marshall v. Northwest Orient Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Empire Steel Manufacturing Co. v. MarshallDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1977
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.