Legal Opinion

Kuykendall v. Turner

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 19, 1983No. 8218SC424PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

The primary question on this appeal is if it was proper for the trial judge to enter directed verdicts on the trespass and punitive damage issues at the close of the plaintiff s evidence and on the assault and battery issues while the jury was deliberating.

I. Directed Verdict Standard

In reviewing the grant of a directed verdict on appeal, we “must consider all the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and may grant the motion only if, as a matter of law, the evidence is insufficient to justify a verdict for the plaintiff.” Kelly v. Harvester Co., 278 N.C. 153,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dickens v. PuryearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Summey v. CauthenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Matthews v. ForrestSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Clemmons v. Life Insurance Company of GeorgiaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Myrick v. CooleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Maintenance Equipment Co., Inc. v. Godley BuildersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  5. Fowler v. ValencourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API