Legal Opinion

Thompson & Son v. Brown

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 15, 1898PublishedCited by 14 opinions

'Appeal from Marshall District Court. — Hon. Obed Gas-well, Judge. Action to recover damages arising from a breach, of contract. Trial to jury. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtWaterman, J.

*3691 *3702 3 *368Plaintiff firm sues for breach of a contract partly written and partly oral, tbe written portion of which, is as follows: “Bangor, Iowa, October 20, 1896. This *369article of agreement, entered into between J. IT. Thompson &. Son, of the first part, and W. IT. Brown, second part. We, Thompson & Son, of the first part, agree to drill a well for W. TI. Brown, second part, four-inch casing-galvanized as far down as possible. W. H. Brown, second part, agrees to pay $1.00 per lineal foot, and furnish board for-men and team. Said J. II. Thompson & Son to furnish plenty water, or no pay. Water to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. German Savings Bank v. Citizens National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  2. Moline Scale Co. v. BeedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879
  3. Welch v. SpiesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  4. Pixler v. NicholsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
  5. Eyser v. WeissgerberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1856

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Morbey v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Waters v. PearsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  3. Harrison v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  4. Elwood Oil & Gas Co. v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Godburn v. MeserveSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API