Welch v. Spies
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Gass District Gourt. — Hon. A. B. Thornell, J udge. Action at law to re cover the unpaid portion of the price of com alleged to have been ¡sold and delivered by the plaintiff to defendant. There was a trial by jury, and a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtEobinson, J.
The plaintiff claims that in the latter part of July, in the year 1894, he sold ¡and delivered to the defendant two thousand three hundred bushels of corn contained in two cribs, at the agreed price of fifty cents per 'bushel. The defendant admits that he entered into a verbal agreement with the plaintiff for the purchase of not less than one thousand, six hundred nor more than two thousand 'bushels of corn at the price stated, and that fifty dollars were paid to the plaintiff by virtue of the agreement; but denies that the corn was delivered, and alleges that the plaintiff has failed and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kimberly v. . PatchinNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Leonard v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
- Mackellar v. PillsburySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Courtright v. LeonardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
- Waldron v. ChaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1854
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Rotterman v. General Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1953
- E. L. Welch Co. v. Lahart Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Hamilton v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Hughson Condensed Milk Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Sempel v. Northern Hardwood Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1909
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.