Legal Opinion
Chewning v. Schlesinger
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 23, 1979No. Civ. A. 76-334PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
FLANNERY, District Judge.
On February 27, 1976, the plaintiff June Chewning filed a class action complaint against the Atomic Energy Commission (“AEC”), alleging a pattern and practice of sex discrimination prohibited by Section 717 of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (1976). The court subsequently certified a class to include all women employed in “professional” positions between January 19, 1975 and September 30, 1977 at the Energy Research and Development Administration (“ERDA”), AEC’s successor agency, in Washington, D. C. and…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Thompson v. SawyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Chisholm v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Etta B. SAUNDERS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William Graham CLAYTOR, Jr., Secretary of the Navy, Et Al., Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Thompson v. BoyleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1980
- Hartman v. WickDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.