Legal Opinion
Hartman v. Wick
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 16, 1988No. Civ. A. 77-2019PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................page 319 I. THE NEW LAW SET FORTH BY THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN PALMER V. SHULTZ MAY NOT BE APPLIED RETROACTIVELY IN THIS CASE ........................................................................................... 319
II. THE OCCUPATIONAL CATEGORIES AT ISSUE IN THIS SUIT .... 320
A. The job categories in which the Court found discrimination have been reclassified ...................................................................... 320
B.…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hartman v. DuffeyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Carolee Brady Hartman v. Joseph Duffey, Director, United States Information AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Macarz v. Transworld Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- Hartman v. DuffeyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Wise v. GlickmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.