Legal Opinion

Larson v. H.E. Butt Grocery Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided April 13, 1989No. 13-87-533-CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEERDEN, Justice.

Appellants challenge a judgment based on a unanimous jury finding that the evidence did not support Apryl Larson’s claim that she slipped and fell in appellee’s Bee-ville store. Their petition alleged she fell on April 16, 1982. Their three points of error complain of the pretrial discovery process. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Appellants’ first point complains of the trial court’s refusal to grant a continuance after appellee’s alleged failure to produce discoverable documents. Point two states that the court erred to the extent that it ordered documents about…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Villegas v. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Jampole v. TouchyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Ginsberg v. Fifth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Medical Protective Co. v. Glanz, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
  5. Wakefield v. Bevly, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Electronic Data Systems Corp. v. Tyson, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
  2. Westfall Family Farms, Inc. v. King Ranch, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993
  3. Ramirez v. Otis Elevator Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  4. Rosedale Partners, Ltd. v. Resolution Trust Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
  5. WAYELL v. Roberts, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API