Tatsuno v. Pedersen
California Court of Appeal
'APPEAL from a-judgment of the Superior Court -of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the defendant entered upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order denying the plaintiff a new trial.
The action was founded upon a written order drawn upon the defendant in favor of the plaintiff by W. Mori, Tanaka Bros., and W. Wantanabe, Japanese labor contractors, who had previously entered into a contract with the defendant to furnish laborers for the. work of canning salmon during the fishing season of 1909 at defendant’s cannery at Bristol Bay on the coast of Alaska. The order in question requested the defendant to pay to the plaintiff…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cutting Fruit Packing Co. v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Escondido Oil & Development Co. v. GlaserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- McComber v. KellermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Hogan v. Globe Mutual Building & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- O'Brien v. GaribaldiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Lovelock v. RogersNevada Supreme Court · 1927
- Ward v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931
- Ward v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931
- Ward v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1931