First Nat. Bank of Lovelock v. Rogers
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Assignee cannot be in better position than assignor. 2 A. E. Enc. 1079. After legal reentry of lessors, all rights of sublessee and his assignee were terminated. Lessors are the only persons having right to profits. Assignments are of money not earned, but anticipated, not of contract itself. Bank took with full knowledge of limited rights of assignor, and defendants' right to reenter. Mortgagee of leasehold takes subject to all conditions of lease. Upon termination, mortgage so far as it affects reversion, falls with it. If lessee has sublet, forfeiture terminates estate of sublessee. 24…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Martyn v. Western Pacific Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
- Tatsuno v. PedersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schneiker v. GordonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Babson v. Village of UlyssesNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
- Gordon v. SchneikerColorado Court of Appeals · 1984