Legal Opinion

In re John Doe & Roe Corp.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 20, 1997PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

BROCHIN, J.A.D.

The New Jersey Attorney General served investigative interrogatories on John Doe and Roe Corporation1 pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:41-5. That statute reads in part as follows:

a. Whenever the Attorney General determines that there exists a reasonable suspicion that any person or enterprise may have information or be in possession, custody, or control of any documentary materials relevant to an investigation under this chapter [Chapter 41, Racketeering], or whenever the Attorney General believes it to be in the public interest that an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Petition to Compel Testimony of TusoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
  2. In re DoeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. McAllisterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. State v. McAllisterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API