Legal Opinion
In re Doe
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 31, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARD J. WILLIAMS, A.J.S.C.
Petitioners John Doe and Roe Corporation, having been served with Investigative Interrogatories under New Jersey’s RICO statute, N.J.S.A. 2C:41-1 to 41-6.2, come before the court to have the Interrogatories modified or set aside.
On July 27, 1995, the Attorney General’s office served petitioners with Investigative Interrogatories pursuant to N.J.S.A 2C:41-5. The Interrogatories directed petitioners to appear at the offices of the Division of Criminal Justice Organized Crime and Racketeering Bureau to furnish information demanded therein in connection with an…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. McAllisterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- In re John Doe & Roe Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Matter of John Doe and Roe Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- State v. McAllisterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005