Dannenbrink v. Burger
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from, an order of the Superior Court of Trinity County refusing a new trial. Stanley A. Smith, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
This is a suit to quiet title to certain water-rights and to enjoin the defendants from claiming or asserting any claim to said water-rights a.nd from interfering with the full enjoyment thereof by the plaintiffs.
The defendants were awarded judgment on the issues made by their 'answer to the complaint.
In due time the plaintiffs presented a motion for a new trial, which was denied, and this appeal is prosecuted by them from the order denying said motion.
The vital point upon which the decision of the controversy between the plaintiffs and the defendants must depend involves the question whether…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Hanson v. McCueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- Duckworth v. Watsonville Water & Light Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Smith v. HawkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Senior v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Stevens v. Oakdale Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Crane v. StevinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Ward v. City of MonroviaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- E. Clemens Horst Co. v. New Blue Point Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Stepp v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.