Legal Opinion

Skowron v. Skowron

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1951PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Defendant demurred because, (1) the court has no jurisdiction over the subject of the action, and (2) the complaint does not state a cause of action. We consider that the demurrer should have been sustained on the latter ground.

Jurisdiction to enter declaratory judgments is given the court by sec. 269.56, Stats. Read literally, the subsections (2) and (3) thereof seem to require courts to give advisory opinions in any question concerning a contract, but before the law was enacted in Wisconsin other states had enacted and construed it, as the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act, which…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. La Follette v. DammannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Heller v. ShapiroWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Rosenberg v. Village of Whitefish BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Northwestern National Insurance v. FreedyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Village of Sun Prairie v. Wisconsin Power & Light Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Moscoso v. RiveraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1954
  2. Klaus v. Vander HeydenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Tooley v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Pension Management, Inc. v. DuRoseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. v. RollinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API