Legal Opinion

United States v. Gregory Lee Harris and Larry Hollins

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 26, 1976No. 75-2045 and 75-2046PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before HUFSTEDLER and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and CHRISTENSEN, * District Judge. CHRISTENSEN, District Judge:

We are called upon to decide in this case whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying appellants’ motions for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence relating to the mental competency of a key witness against them, or in refusing the requested appointment of a psychiatrist to assist in a further attempt to establish that the witness was significantly incompetent at the time he testified.

Appellants, together with one Larry Lee Ford, were jointly charged…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Buddy Joe BarnardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  2. United States v. Frank CostelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  3. United States v. James Walter ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. Ben J. Slutsky and Julius S. Slutsky D/B/A "The Nevele,"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  5. United States v. Anthony Polisi and Salvatore PolisiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Gale Nace and Nathan J. Warren, Sr., United States of America v. Ned Warren, Sr., and Gale NaceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  2. United States v. BaconUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. SimmsDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1980
  4. United States v. Howard Vincent PernoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. Gale Nace and Nathan J. Warren, Sr., United States of America v. Ned Warren, Sr., and Gale NaceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API