United States v. Gregory Lee Harris and Larry Hollins
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before HUFSTEDLER and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and CHRISTENSEN, * District Judge. CHRISTENSEN, District Judge:
We are called upon to decide in this case whether the trial court abused its discretion by denying appellants’ motions for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence relating to the mental competency of a key witness against them, or in refusing the requested appointment of a psychiatrist to assist in a further attempt to establish that the witness was significantly incompetent at the time he testified.
Appellants, together with one Larry Lee Ford, were jointly charged…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Buddy Joe BarnardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Frank CostelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- United States v. James Walter ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Ben J. Slutsky and Julius S. Slutsky D/B/A "The Nevele,"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Anthony Polisi and Salvatore PolisiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Gale Nace and Nathan J. Warren, Sr., United States of America v. Ned Warren, Sr., and Gale NaceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. BaconUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. SimmsDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1980
- United States v. Howard Vincent PernoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Gale Nace and Nathan J. Warren, Sr., United States of America v. Ned Warren, Sr., and Gale NaceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977