Legal Opinion

American Automobile Ass'n v. Rothman

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided February 28, 1952No. Civ. 11350PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYERS, District Judge.

In the opinion in this case reported in D.C., 101 F.Supp. 193, reference is made to two respects in which defendant’s answer was thought to contain matters as to which there was no “good ground” as required by Rule 11 of the Federal Rules.of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., although the pleading was signed by the defendant’s attorney. He was requested to submit an explanatory statement in order that the Court might inquire into this subject, and he did so; the statement proved to be unsatisfactory in form and substance, and accordingly the ■ defendant’s attorney was invited…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Auto. Ass'n v. RothmanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1951
  2. American Auto. Ass'n v. SpiegelDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1951

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Vinita v. KisseeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Commonwealth v. McLeodMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  3. FIRST NAT. BANK AND TRUST v. KisseeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Commodore Tilden v. Frank J. Pate, Warden, Illinois State Penitentiary, Joliet, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
  5. Nelson H. Weade v. Trailways of New England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API