Legal Opinion

American Auto. Ass'n v. Rothman

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 14, 1951No. Civ. 11350PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYERS, District Judge.

This is a plaintiffs’ motion to strike an answer, to dismiss counterclaim, and to grant summary judgment to plaintiffs under Rule 56, Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C.A., because it now appears that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact, in view of the testimony revealed in the respective depositions of the defendant and her husband.

The cause in general resembles the one instituted by these plaintiffs against Murray Spiegel, doing business as Lake Service Station, American Automobile Ass’n v. Spiegel, D. C., 101 F.Supp. 185, and much that was written in granting…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. American Auto. Ass'n v. SpiegelDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Continental Connector Corp. v. Continental Specialties Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1979
  2. American Automobile Ass'n v. RothmanDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API