Legal Opinion
Sommer v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 15, 1974No. 2 CA-CIV 1510PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
The facts which gave rise to this controversy are as follows. Appellant (plaintiff below) is an attorney practicing law in Tucson, Arizona. Appellee (defendant below) is an exclusively-franchised utility providing telephone service in Tucson. As' part of its ordinary telephone'services, defendant, upon request and for a reasonable time undertakes to monitor a previous telephone number, intercept incoming calls and refer callers to a new number of the subscriber. This is called “intercept service”.
Prior to the month of May, 1971, plaintiff was using and was listed in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Warner v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- New Pueblo Const., Inc. v. LAKE PATAGONIA REC. ASSOCIATION, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Meason v. Ralston Purina Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1940
- Heidlebaugh v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
3Cited by10 opinions
- Behrend v. Bell Telephone Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Satellite System, Inc. v. Birch Telecom of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. TCI Mail, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1991
- Olson v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- US Airways, Inc. v. Qwest Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.