Legal Opinion

Kirwin v. Attorney General

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 2, 1931PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

The residuary clause of the last will of Francis Buttrick of Waltham in the county of Middlesex set out: “ All the rest, residue and remainder of my estate, however invested, designated, or described, I give, devise, bequeath to my executors hereinafter named, in trust, for such public charitable purposes as shall meet their approval under the conditions in which they may be called to act.” The will bore date of December 29, 1892, and was duly admitted to probate on November 7, 1894. Five persons were nominated as executors, all of whom qualified. The survivor, Thomas H. Armstrong, died in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Tevis v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1858
  2. Olliffe v. WellsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  3. White v. DitsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  4. Nichols v. AllenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  5. Bullard v. ChandlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wellesley College v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Estate of BunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Judkins v. Hyannis Public Library Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Westport Bank & Trust Co. v. FableSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  5. Davenport v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API