Legal Opinion

Kline v. Kline

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 1981No. Docket 50261PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal by leave granted from an order denying plaintiff-intervenor’s motion to quash writs of garnishment. The intervenor claimed that the obligation of the garnishee was to it, the professional corporation, and not to its sole shareholder, Robert L. Kline.

Robert L. Kline and Dorothy A. Kline were parties to an action which ended in a judgment of divorce. As part of the property settlement, Dr. Kline agreed to pay a certain sum of money to defendant. He did not pay and defendant sought to garnish debts owed to him by, among others, Delta Dental Plan. Delta disclosed that it owed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Bourne v. Muskegon Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Paul v. University Motor Sales Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Williams v. American Title InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Brown Bros. Equipment Co. v. State Highway CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Meyer & Anna Prentis Family Foundation, Inc. v. Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer InstituteMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. James R. Smith, M.D. v. Northern Michigan Hospitals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  3. People v. JamiesonMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Law Offices of Lawrence J Stockler, PC v. RoseMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Foodland Distributors v. Al-NaimiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API