Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Acireno

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided December 30, 1982No. CM 442648PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*571OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

This case involves a situation where the appellant was for all intents and purposes, in the status of “arrest” for a period of 153 days prior to his general court-martial trial.1

On 4 December 1981 the appellant was apprehended for fondling, while babysitting, the five-year old daughter of a fellow service-member. After providing a statement in which he confessed to the crime, appellant was released back to his unit.

In the early hours of the following day, 5 December 1981, his company commander, Captain (CPT) Mark Collier placed him on restriction, issuing an oral order…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. BurtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  3. United States v. SchilfUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  4. United States v. WallsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  5. United States v. RowseyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  2. United States v. McCallisterU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
  3. Wiggins v. GreenwaldU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  4. United States v. AmosU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986
  5. United States v. KeckU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API