Legal Opinion
Dependents of Pacheco v. Orchids of Hawaii
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided November 8, 1972No. 5198PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
RICHARDSON, C.J.
This appeal, pursuant to HRS § 386-88 (Supp. 1971)1 *67arises out of a workmen’s compensation claim by the dependents of Wilma P. Pacheco, deceased, against her employer, Orchids of Hawaii. The claim was denied by the Director of the Department of Labor and Industrial Relations. On appeal, the Labor and Industrial Relations Appeals Board made an award of compensation.
The facts are not in dispute having been stipulated by the parties.
Mrs. Pacheco was employed by Orchids of Hawaii (hereinafter “Employer”) on and prior to July 7, 1967. She worked as a member…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jordan v. Western Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- Claim of Caporale v. State Department of Taxation & FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
- Claim of Caporale v. State Department of Taxation & FinanceNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Claim of Balsam v. New York State Division of EmploymentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Claim of Bodensky v. Royaltone, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
3Cited by23 opinions
- Chung v. Animal Clinic, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- Tate v. GTE Hawaiian Telephone Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1994
- Pauley v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- M-K Rivers v. SchleifmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- McClure v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.