Legal Opinion

Watts v. Internal Revenue Service

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided April 19, 1996No. Civil Action 95-5437PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ORLOFSKY, District Judge:

Plaintiffs, Michael and Barbara Watts, acting pro se, filed this action against the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and J.J. Jennings, L. Walling and Cynthia Moody, all IRS employees, in their individual capacities. Plaintiffs seek relief from certain tax liens and tax levies, as well as other specified and unspecified damages.

Count 1 of plaintiffs’ complaint seeks an order demanding that the IRS answer plaintiffs’ “request for status” and, further, seeks to estop the IRS from contesting an “affidavit” which plaintiffs mailed to the IRS by which “plaintiff…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Maertin v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
  2. United States v. FloydCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  3. Fuller v. United States (In Re Fuller)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Fletcher-Harlee Corp. v. Pote Concrete Contractors, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
  5. Maruska v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API