Legal Opinion
Maruska v. United States
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 2, 1999No. Civ. 98-790 RLEPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
ERICKSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Introduction
This matter came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to the parties’ consent, made in accordance with the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), upon the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, for Summary Judgment. 1 See, Rules 12(b)(1), (b)(6), and 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. A Hearing on the Motion was conducted on May 11, 1999, at which the Plaintiffs appeared pro se, and the Defendant appeared by Carl J. Tierney, United States Department of Justice. For reasons…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Waltner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Hamzik v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Gregoline v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Minnesota School Board Ass'n Insurance Trust v. United States Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2001
- Ringsred v. City of DuluthDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.