Legal Opinion

Brotherton v. Gilchrist

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1906No. Docket No. 205PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Sanilac; Beach, J. Bill by Wilbur Brotherton against William A. Gilchrist, Perry F. Trowbridge and the Sanilac Sugar Refining Company for a partnership accounting. From a decree dismissing the bill as to defendant Gilchrist, the other defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, C. J.

This is a suit in equity for a partnership accounting. The business of the partnership was that of raising sugar beets in the county of Huron in the year 1902. Complainant, defendant Trowbridge, and defendant Gilchrist each was interested in this business. Complainant and Trowbridge were partners in said business, and the important question in the case is whether Gilchrist was also a partner. The trial court decided that he was not, and entered a decree in accordance with that decision. From that decree defendants Trowbridge and the Sanilac Sugar Refining Company (a creditor of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beecher v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Canton Bridge Co. v. City of Eaton RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Dutcher v. BuckMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Chariton Feed and Grain, Inc. v. HarderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
  2. Fletcher v. FletcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  3. O. K. Boiler & Welding Co. v. Minnetonka Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Rosenblum v. Springfield Produce Brokerage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  5. State ex rel. Ratliffe v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API