Legal Opinion

Stafford Co. v. Coldwell-Gildard Co.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided January 30, 1913No. 994PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts; Arthur U. Brown, Judge. Suit in equity by Coldwell-Gildard Company and others against the Stafford Company. Decree for complainants, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

PUTNAM, Circuit Judge.

This case, in our opinion, turns on the validity of a reissued patent to Coldwell & Gildard, dated July 30, 1901, No. 11,923, entitled “Warp Stop-Motion for Looms.” The reissued patent contained 30 claims, of which claims 19 to 30, each inclusive, were brought in on the reissue, and are the only claims we need especially trouble ourselves about.

The patent is for a warp stop-motion for looms. Original claims 3 to 18, each inclusive, related to a combination of a drop-bar with other elements, constituting a warp stop-motion for looms; but claims 1 and 2 related only to a…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Parker v. BallantineCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
  2. Northrop v. Draper Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1917
  3. American Steel Foundries v. LaughlinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1927
  4. Standard Mailing Machines Co. v. Ditto, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1938
  5. Coldwell-Gildard Co. v. Stafford Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API