Legal Opinion

American Steel Foundries v. Laughlin

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 8, 1927No. 6356PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKERSON, District Judge.

Much of this bill is framed as if it were for relief against tbe fraud of defendants in connection with the assignment. There are averments as to suppression of facts and conspiracy to extort money for tbe patent to be issued and insinuations of unprofessional conduct. Defendants, however, offer to repay tbe $5,000 if plaintiff will reassign tbe patent. Plaintiff rejects this tender, repudiates any design to seek a rescission, and adopts and stands on the contract. íhe allegations of fraud, therefore, seem to.have no place in tbe case, except to give some kind of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Dalzell v. Dueber Watch Case Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Colson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1817
  4. The Suffolk Company v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  5. Javierre v. Central AltagraciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re LaughlinCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1931
  2. Moist Cold Refrigerator Co. v. Lou Johnson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  3. Moist Cold Refrigerator Co. v. Lou Johnson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API