Legal Opinion
Coldwell-Gildard Co. v. Stafford Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 10, 1913No. 156 (C. C. 683)Published
In Equity. Suit by the Coldwell-Gildard Company and others against the Stafford Company for infringement of reissue patent No. 11,923 (original No. 637,234), granted to Coldwell and Gildard July 30, 1901, for a warp stop motion for looms.
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, District Judge.
This cause was remanded to this court for proceedings in accordance .with the opinion of the Circuit Court of Appeals, dated January 30, 1913. 202 Fed. 744. In that opinion it is stated:
“The reissue is invalid as to claim 19, and all claims substantially broader than claim 23. It is not within our province to go through all these numerous claims, and sift out the result of our conclusion. Therefore we leave it to the District Court to work out the details of that character.”
The complainant moves for a decree upon claims 23 and 25, withdrawing all other claims, and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stafford Co. v. Coldwell-Gildard Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1913