GTE Southwest Inc. v. Public Utility Commission
Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)
1DissentPowers, Justice
The legislature explicitly declared that the kind of agency proceeding now before us “is not a rate case.” PURA § 3.211(i) (emphasis added). The majority conclude nevertheless that such a proceeding is a rate case. Believing this to be an unjustified negation of the plainly stated legislative will, I respectfully dissent.1
Since 1976, PURA has provided that “[a] utility may not make changes in its rates except” by fihng in the Commission a statement of intent to change its rates, initiating thereby a rate case. Id. § 3.211(a) (emphasis added). A utility may not under PURA increase its “rates”…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Acker v. Texas Water CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1968
- Citizens Bank of Bryan v. First State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- Southwestern Public Service Co. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
- Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. United North & South Development Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.