Legal Opinion · Dissent

GTE Southwest Inc. v. Public Utility Commission

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided June 18, 1998No. 03-97-00619-CVPublished

1DissentPowers, Justice

The legislature explicitly declared that the kind of agency proceeding now before us “is not a rate case.” PURA § 3.211(i) (emphasis added). The majority conclude nevertheless that such a proceeding is a rate case. Believing this to be an unjustified negation of the plainly stated legislative will, I respectfully dissent.1

Since 1976, PURA has provided that “[a] utility may not make changes in its rates except” by fihng in the Commission a statement of intent to change its rates, initiating thereby a rate case. Id. § 3.211(a) (emphasis added). A utility may not under PURA increase its “rates”…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Acker v. Texas Water CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Railroad Commission of Texas v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Citizens Bank of Bryan v. First State BankTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Southwestern Public Service Co. v. Public Utility Commission of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  5. Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. United North & South Development Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API