Legal Opinion

Eagan v. Murray

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 12, 1918No. 20,971PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from Sherman district court; Charles I. Sparks, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

The plaintiffs recovered judgment against the defendants on a promissory note for $300, given in payment-for a breeding jack which plaintiffs- had sold to the defendant upon a warranty that it would beget forty per cent of foals, *194and upon an agreement to take back the animal if his breeding record did not fulfill the warranty. The contract of sale was referred to in the promissory note, and a copy of the contract was attached to plaintiffs’ petition. The contract also provided that in case of a return of the animal, the defendants were to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bruington v. WagonerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Bruington v. WagonerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Grentner v. FehrenschieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  4. Wideman v. FaivreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  5. Walker v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Beachy v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  2. Snehoda v. First National Bank in WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. Fisher v. RakestrawSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  4. Eberhardt Lumber Co. v. LecuyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  5. Manhattan State Bank v. Wamego State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API