American Railway Express Co. v. Royster Guano Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds
Following an agreement of June, 1918, by the Adams Express Company, American Express Company, Southern Express Company (a Georgia corporation) .and Wells Fargo & Company, the principal concerns then engaged in express transportation throughout the Union, the. American Railway Expréss Company was incorporated under the laws of Delaware and, by issuing its capital stock, acquired, July Í, 1918, all property of those carriers theretofore utilized in connection with such ■ business. The Southern Express Company owned no other property located in Virginia,. After this transfer it retired from the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mutual Reserve Fund Life Assn. v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Hunter v. Mutual Reserve Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- American Railway Express Co. v. F. S. Royster Guano Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1925
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hicklin v. ConeySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Washington Ex Rel. Bond & Goodwin & Tucker, Inc. v. Superior Court of Wash. for Spokane Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States Ex Rel. Keating v. BensingerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1971
- United States Ex Rel. Siegal v. FolletteDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Edgewater Realty Co. v. Tenn. Coal, Iron & Railroad Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.