Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. McClucas

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 30, 1988No. 213PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order dismissing appellant’s Post Conviction Hearing Act (PCHA) petition without an evidentiary hearing. Appellant asserts that the trial court erred in dismissing the petition when it raised: (1) the subsequent availability of exculpatory evidence that would have affected the outcome of the trial, and (2) the ineffectiveness of trial counsel for failure to appeal. We affirm.

In February, 1985, as the result of numerous incidents that occurred between appellant and his daughter, L.M., appellant was charged with corruption of minors, endangering the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. FloydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. RiniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. SchuckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LonerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. GranberrySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Commonwealth v. BlackwellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. State v. MulkeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. RounsleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API