Legal Opinion

State v. Mulkey

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 6, 1989No. 22 September Term, 1988PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKWELL, Judge.

In this criminal case involving a charge of child abuse and multiple sexual offense allegations, we are asked to determine the sufficiency of an indictment under Maryland Rule 4-202(a), which governs the requirements of a charging document

Md.Rule 4-202(a) provides in pertinent part: “A charging document shall ... contain a concise and definite statement of the essential facts of the offense with which the defendant is charged and, with reasonable particularity, the time and place the offense occurred(Emphasis added). 1 Specifically, we evaluate whether indictments alleging…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Ledbetter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. State v. HauckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. NiemetzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Michael E. Valentine v. Khelleh Konteh, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  2. Borchardt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Denicolis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Wiggins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  5. Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API