Legal Opinion
Mylan Laboratories, Inc. v. Leavitt
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 29, 2007No. Civil Action 07-579 (RMU)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Denying Mylan’s EmeRgency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order
URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the plaintiffs emergency motion for a temporary restraining order. Plaintiff Mylan Laboratories asks the court to order the FDA to relist Pfizer’s patent for Norvasc on its patent register. , Currently, the plaintiff is one of only two generic drug manufacturers who market their generic version of this drug to the public. A prior ruling from this court recognized that My-lan would enjoy generic market exclusivity as to this drug until…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission v. Holiday Tours, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Lashawn A. v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Mova Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Friends for All Children, Inc. v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Akiachak Native Community v. United States Department of InteriorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Amore Ex Rel. Estates of Amore v. Accor North America, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- CAREER COLLEGE ASS'N v. DuncanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Career College Association v. DuncanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011