Legal Opinion
Yates v. Hanna Min. Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 9, 1985No. C7-84-1073PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
This is a slip and fall case. Appellant Wiley Yates (Yates) appeals the court’s denial of his motions for new trial and for judgment n.o.v. He contends that the court erred by refusing him the opportunity to comment on jury instructions and by submitting misleading instructions to the jury. Respondent Mathews Engineering (Mathews) filed a notice of review contesting a jury instruction that it had a nondele-gable duty to provide Yates with a safe work area and contesting denial of its motion for directed verdict against Hanna Mining (Hanna). We reverse and remand.
FACTS
On…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lambertson v. Cincinnati Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & KeefeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Lee v. Crookston Coca-Cola Bottling CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Steinhaus v. AdamsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Cambern v. Sioux Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bardsley v. IPEC, INC.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Conwed Corp. v. UNION CARBIDE CHEMICALS AND PLAST. CO.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2001
- Yates v. Hanna Min. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985