Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Siegal

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 12, 1952No. 16690PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alter

Thomas J. Sullivan and Marie E. Sullivan, plaintiffs-in error, plaintiffs below, brought an action against S. I. Siegal, individually and doing business as Universal Investment Company, defendant in error, defendant below, to recover a judgment for $1,455.45 allegedly due them by reason of defendant collecting interest in excess of that allowable under the provisions of section 7, chapter 108, S.L. Colo. 1913.

Upon trial to the court, on motion of défendant the action was dismissed and judgment entered accordingly, to review which plaintiffs bring the cause here by writ of error.

It is alleged…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re BreeneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  2. United States v. GearSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  3. Armstrong v. MittenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
  4. Cavanaugh v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1916
  5. Waddell v. TraylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Title, Ballot Title & Submission Clause, & Summary for 1999-2000 25 v. BruceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  2. City of Albuquerque v. CampbellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1960
  3. White v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  4. Dennis v. BradburyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1964
  5. In Re BlackUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API