Legal Opinion
Van Wart v. Commissioner
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 29, 1935No. 95PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds
The sole question for determination is whether an attorney’s fee, paid by the guardian for conducting litiga tion to secure income for his ward, was a business expense within § 214 (a) (1), Revenue Act, 1924, and therefore deductible from the minor’s gross income. The facts, as stated by the court below, were these—
"Catherine L. Van Wart, a minor, was the beneficiary of a trust created by the will of her grandfather, Jenkins Jones, deceased. Dr. Roy M. Van Wart, Catherine’s father, with whom she resided in Orleans Parish, Louisiana, after being confirmed by order of the district court for…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kornhauser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Freuler v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Van Wart v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1924
3Cited by38 opinions
- Higgins v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Lykes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Kales v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- Bartholomew v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.