Sealey v. State

The petitioner was tried under an indictment charging that he “falsely pretended to G. F. Wlngard, with intent to defraud, that he had $69 in the Bank of Ramer, Alabama, and by means of such false pretenses obtained from the said G. E. Wingard five head of cattle of the value of $69.1

The finding of fact by the Court of Appeals that the evidence adduced on the trial tended to sustain the charge and warranted a finding by the jury that the petitioner was guilty, is conclusive on this review, that the evidence was sufficient to sustain- the verdict, and the ruling of the Court of Appeals…