Legal Opinion
Heck v. C.H. Heist Corp.
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided May 21, 1986No. Civ. A. 84-A015PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HADEN, Chief Judge.
This action by five employees (Plaintiffs) of the C.H. Heist Corporation is brought under Section 301 of the Labor-Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 185. The employees sue their employer for breach of a collective bargaining agreement; they also sue their international and local unions for an alleged violation of their duty to provide fair representation. Both unions have moved the Court for dismissal.
The International Brotherhood of Painters and Allied Trades (the International) bases its motion on a service of process issue. It…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. HardisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Carbon Fuel Co. v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Central Operating Company v. Utility Workers of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. General Teamsters, Chauffeurs and Helpers Union, Local 249Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- Ronald Sine and Larry Danner v. Local No. 992, International Brotherhood of Teamsters Eastern Conference of Teamsters, and Mitchell Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Norton v. Adair CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1989