Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Rowland

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 3, 2018No. CV-16-903PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRaymond R. Abramson, Judge

Appellants Connie and Richard Watkins bring this appeal, which stems from a long-standing dispute regarding Paragould Light & Water Commission's (PLWC) tree trimming around their property. During the dispute, PLWC engaged licensed land surveyor Bradley P. Hancock and his business Bradley P. Hancock Surveying and Mapping (collectively "Hancock") to perform a land survey. Hancock's survey located certain trees that appellants understood to be on their property as being beyond its boundaries. Appellants believe Hancock's survey was maliciously and fraudulently performed and filed two complaints…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. Arkansas Children's HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Rad-Razorback Ltd. Partnership v. B.G. Coney Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Goff v. Harold Ives Trucking Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Lane v. RachelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1965
  5. TERIS, LLC v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lee Ko v. Esther WillsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2025
  2. Weiner v. Merchant Capital Grp., LLCCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2024
  3. Carlton Newsome v. City of El Dorado, ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2022
  4. Swillie v. CooperDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API