Legal Opinion

Daves v. Lufkin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 18, 1930No. 1 Div. 618PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBotjldin, J.

In 1928, Lufkin & Robinson entered Into a joint enterprise with C. H. Millsap of At-more, Ala., to grow potatoes fox- the market. Millsap furnished the seed potatoes as the equivalent of the fertilizer furnished by Lufkin & Robinson. For the additional contributions of Lufkin & Robinson in furnishing the land and labor to grow, gather and ship the product, they were to receive $1,750 out of the first proceeds.

At market time it was arranged for Millsap to do the marketing. Accordingly, hills of lading for six cars were made out to Millsap, as consignee, destination, Nashville, Tenn. He, in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hill, Fontaine & Co. v. HeltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  2. Cosmos Cotton Co. v. 1st National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Commercial Bank v. HurtSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  4. Voss & Co. v. Robertson, Brown & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1871
  5. Hawkins v. Damson & AbrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hollis v. BenderAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Hollis v. BenderAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API