Legal Opinion

Hollis v. Bender

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided January 20, 1948No. 4 Div. 27Published

1Opinion of the Court

CARR, Judge.

In aid of pending suit by Leo Bendei against H. F. York, a garnishment was issued to E. H. Hollis. On the trial of the cause below, a judgment was rendered against the defendant and also against the garnishee. Only the latter brings this appeal.

The defendant, York, entered into an oral agreement with the garnishee, Hollis, by the terms of which the latter was to furnish eighty-five hogs which the former would take and pasture on his ungathered peanut crop. Mr. York was to look after the hogs, water them, and give them such attention as their needs required. It was agreed further…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Henry v. Murphy & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1875
  2. Thompson v. MawhinneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
  3. Warner v. WarnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  4. Archer v. People's Savings BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  5. Jones's Adm'r v. CrewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API