Legal Opinion

Sochor v. Florida

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 8, 1992No. 91-5843PublishedCited by 333 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Souter

Under Florida law, after a defendant is found guilty of capital murder, a separate jury proceeding is held as the first of two steps in deciding whether his sentence should be life imprisonment or death. Fla. Stat. §921.141(1) (1991). At the close of such aggravating and mitigating evidence as the prosecution and the defense may introduce, the trial judge charges the jurors to weigh whatever aggravating and mitigating circumstances or factors they may find, and to reach an advisory verdict by majority vote. §921.141(2). The jury does not report specific findings of aggravating and mitigating…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Eddings v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Harris v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by333 opinions

  1. Lambrix v. SingletarySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Deck v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Robert Glen Coe, Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Ricky Bell, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  5. Bell v. ConeSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

328 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API