McCormick Saeltzer Co. v. Grizzly Creek Lumber Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, J., pro tem.
These are actions, tried jointly upon an alleged promise of defendant Grizzly Creek Lumber Company to pay the indebtedness of Shasta Mill and Lumber Company to the respective plaintiffs', for goods and merchandise sold and delivered. By stipulation both eases were submitted on the same evidence. The defendant Shasta Mill and Lumber Company defaulted. Both plaintiffs had judgment as prayed for. For convenience the Grizzly Creek Lumber Company will be referred to as defendant.
The Shasta Mill and Lumber Company was operating a lumber mill in Shasta County. It was indebted…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Erkenbrecher v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Gribble v. Columbus Brewing Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Swartz v. BurrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Goodwin v. Central Broadway Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
- Beck v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Morgan Clark v. MillsapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Kohn v. KohnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Loeb v. KimmerleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Fruitvale Canning Co. v. CottonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Shepard v. YaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.