Legal Opinion

Kuhnen v. Kuhnen

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1933No. 21459. Decree affirmedPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Duncan

This is an appeal from a decree of the circuit court of Cook county dismissing a bill filed by appellant, Auguste ICuhnen, (herein called complainant,) to set aside an ante-nuptial agreement between her and Nicholas ICuhnen, deceased.

The undisputed facts as shown by the record are as follows: Nicholas ICuhnen was married to Emma ICuhnen and they lived together as man and wife for more than twenty years and until her death. They had two sons, Karl P. and Arthur N. Kuhnen (herein referred to as defendants). In January, 1923, complainant, who was then a widow, named Auguste Sachau, having one'…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Winchell v. EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Brown v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Mann v. MannIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Dickason v. EnglishIllinois Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Seuss v. SchukatIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Volid v. VolidAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972
  3. Guhl v. GuhlIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Geiger v. MerleIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Levy v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API