Legal Opinion

Seuss v. Schukat

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 1934No. 22302. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice DeYoung

A decree entered by the superior court of Cook county ordered partition of a parcel of real property among the brother and four sisters of an intestate to the exclusion of her surviving husband and directed him to account for the rents and profits he collected. Otto Schukat, the surviving husband, prosecutes this writ of error to review the record.

Johanna M. Wolfram, a widow, owned in fee simple a certain lot and the building thereon situated in the city of Chicago. On August 29, 1912, she was about to marry Otto Schukat, and in anticipation of the impending change in her status, she entered…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Maynard v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Meister v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Bernatavicius v. BernataviciusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  4. Plaster v. PlasterIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Carpenter v. . OsbornNew York Court of Appeals · 1886

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. KALPLAN v. KaplanIllinois Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Wagner EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Gross v. GrossOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Volid v. VolidAppellate Court of Illinois · 1972

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API