Dragstra v. Northwestern State Bank of Orange City
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
UHLENHOPP, Justice.
This appeal involves the sufficiency of an amended petition to vacate a summary judgment. See rules 252, 253, Rules of Civil Procedure.' The amended petition was attacked by a motion to dismiss. Rule 104(b), R.C.P. Appellants are Rena Dragstra (“Rena”), who is the wife of Chris Dragstra (“Dragstra”), the children of Rena and Dragstra, and the guardian of those children. Appellee, who holds the judgment in question, is Northwestern State Bank of Orange City (“the Bank”).
A motion to dismiss a petition is to be sustained only when “it appears to a certainty plaintiff has…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Graves v. GravesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- State v. MulqueenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971
- Ohlquest v. Farwell & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Scheel v. Superior Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1958
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Acheson v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Dillon v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- Kingvision Pay-Per-View, Ltd. v. AyersSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Forsmark v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
- Rick v. BoegelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.