Legal Opinion
Kingvision Pay-Per-View, Ltd. v. Ayers
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided November 21, 2003No. 1012384PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
The defendant Kingvision Pay-Per-View, Ltd. ("Kingvision"), appeals the denial of a Rule 60(b), Ala. R. Civ. P., motion to vacate a default judgment. We affirm.
Facts
Kingvision, a Delaware corporation headquartered in Florida and the owner of the exclusive right to broadcast the June 28, 1997, fight between Evander Holyfield and Mike…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Smith v. Equifax Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Liberty Nat. v. Univ. of Ala. Health Servs.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Kirtland v. Fort Morgan Auth. Sewer Serv., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Insurance Mgt. & Admin. v. Palomar Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
- Ex Parte Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Coleman v. BAC ServicingCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
- Blackmon v. BrazilSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- Jewel Campbell v. Ethel C. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 2014
- M.M. v. B.L.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005
- Daniel v. MoyeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.